Factors Affecting Viewer’s Television Preferences: A Review

Authors

  • Prochniak Agnieszka

Abstract

The aim of the article is to provide more insight into the relations between individual viewers differences and televisions type program preferences. The literature on media choice typically posits various affective and/or cognitive states as determinative of audiences behavior. Channel and program choice is typically embedded in the routines of day-to-day life of the viewers. Many socio-demographic and psychological factors may influence audiences behavior and their television preferences. Viewers age, gender needs, moods, motivations, personality, sensation seeking trait can be important determinants of media choice and different type of programs. Sociological and psychological approach to media choice helps us appreciate what motivates individuals to use media and how these factors affecting what viewers want to watch.

Keywords: Television preferences, Socio-demographic and Psychological factors, Viewers.

References

Report of European Commission “Attitudes and expectations of viewers in term of television programmes with a European content. Qualitative study in the 25 member states of the EU†www.ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/quali/ql_eutv_en.pdf [access: 20 May 2017]

Mares ML, Oliver MB, & Cantor J (2008) Age differences in adults’ emotional motivations for exposure to films. Media Psychology. 11:488–511.

Tamborni R, & Stiff J (1987) Preference for graphic horror featuring male versus female victimization: Personality and past film viewing experiences. Human Communication Research. 13:529-552.

Bliese NW. Media in the rocking chair: Media uses and functions among the elderly. In: Gumpert G, Cathcart R (1986) Intermedia: Interpersonal communication in a media world. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 573-582.

Gauntlett D, Hill A (1999) TV living: Television, culture and everyday life. London: Routledge, in association with the British Film Institute.

Riggs KE (1998) Mature Audiences: Television in the lives of elders. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London, Rutgers University Press.

Doolittle JC (1979) News media use by older adults. Journalism Quarterly. 56:311-317.

Rubin AM, Rubin RB (1981) Age, context and television use. Journal of Broadcasting. 25:1–13.

Krcmar M, & Greene K (1999) Predicting exposure to and uses of violent television. Journal of Communication. 49(3):25-45.

Tiggemann M (2005) Television and adolescent body image: The role of program content and viewing motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 24(3):361–381.

Nabi RL, Biely E, Morgan S, Stitt C (2003) Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology. 5(4):303-330.

Nabi RL, Stitt CR, Halford J, Finnerty KL (2006) Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology. 8(4):421-447.

Greene K, & Krcmar M (2005) Predicting exposure to and liking of media violence: A uses and gratification approach. Communication Studies. 56(1):71-93.

Zillmann D, Bryant J. Affect, mood, and emotion as determinants of selective exposure. In: Zillmann D, & Bryant J, editors (1985) Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. p. 157-190.

Bagdasarov Z, Greene K, Banerjee SC, Krcmar M, Yanovitzky I, and Ruginyte D (2010) I Am What I Watch: Voyeurism, Sensation Seeking, and Television Viewing Patterns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 54(2):299-315.

[Report of American Press Institute “Social and demographic differences in news habits and attitudes†www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/social-demographic-differences-news-habits-attitudes/ [access: 20 May 2017]

Ward LM, Rivadeneyra R (1999) Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. The Journal of Sex Research. 36:237-249.

Perse EM (1992) Predicting attention to local television news: Need for cognition and motives for viewing. Communication Reports. 5:40-49.

Cavallero J (2004) Gangsters, Fessos, Tricksters and Sopranos: The historical roots of Italian American stereotype anxiety. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 32(2):50.

Reiss S, Wiltz J (2004) Why people watch reality TV. Media Psychology. 6:363-378.

McCrae RR, Costa PT (1999) A five-factor theory of personality. In: Pervin LA, & John OP, editors. (1999) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford Press, New York. p.139-153

Chausson O (2010) Who Watches What? Assessing the Impact of Gender and Personality on Film Preferences. my Personality project. University of Cambridge

Kraaykamp G, & van Eijck K (2005) Personality, media preferences and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences. 38:1675-1688.

Finn S (1997) Origins of media exposure. Linking personality traits to TV, radio, print, and film use. Communication Research. 24: 507-529.

Conway JC, Rubin AM (1991) Psychological predictors of television viewing Motivation. Communication Research. 18:443-463.

Cantador I, Fernández-Tobias I, & Bellogín A (2013) Relating Personality Types with User Preferences in Multiple Entertainment Domains. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services, at the 21st Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Rome, Italy.

Landers RN, Lounsbury JW (2006) An investigation of Big Five and narrow. Personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior. 22:283-293.

Eysenck HJ, Eysenck MW (1985) Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. Plenum Press, New York

Weaver BJ (1991) Exploring the links between personality and media preferences. Personality and Individual Differences. 12:1293-1299.

Zuckerman M, & Little P (1986) Personality and curiosity about morbid and sexual events. Personality and Individual Differences. 7:49-56.

Gunter B (1985) Dimensions of television violence. Gower Press, Aldershot, England

Zuckerman M (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Slater M (2003) Alienation, aggression, and sensation seeking as predictors of adolescent use of violent film, computer, and website content. Journal of Communication. 53:105–121.

Hoffner CA, Levin KJ (2005) Enjoyment of mediated fright and violence: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology. 7(2):207-237.

Rowland G, Fouts G, Heatherton T (1989) Television viewing and sensation seeking: uses, preferences and attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences. 10(9):1003-1006.

Coetzee D, Van Wyk J, Steyn B (2006) Sensation seeking, gender and programme preferences in televised sport. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation. 28(2):15-25.

Lazarus RS, & Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal and coping. Guilford Press, New York.

Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56(2): 267-283.

Endler NS, Parker JDA (1990) Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 58:844-854.

Greenglass ER. Proactive coping and quality of life management. In: Frydenberg E, editor. (2002) Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges. Oxford University Press, London. p. 37-62

Skinner EA, Edge K, Altman J, & Sherwood H (2003) Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Journal of Psychological Bulletin. 129:216-69.

Schwarzer R. Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In: Locke EA, editor. (2000) The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. p. 342-355.

Schwarzer R, Taubert S (2002) Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth: Proactive coping. In: Frydenberg E, editor. (2002) Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges. Oxford University Press, London. p. 19-35.

Gan Y, Yang M, Zhou Y, & Zhang Y (2007) The two-factor structure of future-oriented coping and its mediating role in student engagement. Personality and Individual Differences. 43:851–863.

Anderson J, Collins PA, Schmitt RS, & Jacobowitz RS (1996) Stressful life events and television viewing. Communication Research. 23(2):243-60.

Mares ML, & Cantor J (1992) Elderly viewers' responses to televised portrayals of old age: Empathy and mood management vs. social comparison. Communication Research. 19:459-478.

Dillman FR, Gonzales N, & Dumka L (2009) Adolescent media preferences: A 'window' to their development? Annual meeting of the International Communication Association.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-24